Site Index | Site Tour

    or   Search Tips

National Center on Secondary Education and Transition: Creating opportunities for youth with disabilities to achieve successful futures.

State Contacts
Web Sites

E-mail this page


Emerging & Promising Practices


Non-Approved Accommodations

Thurlow, M., & Wiener, D. (2000). Non-approved accommodations: Recommendations for use and reporting (Policy Directions No. 11). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Thurlow and Wiener (2000) clarify differences between approved and non-approved accommodations. They define approved accommodations as: "changes in the setting in which a test is administered, the timing of a test, the scheduling of a test, the ways in which the test is presented, and the ways in which the student responds to the test. Almost universally, the term is used to refer to changes that do not alter in any significant way what the test measures or the comparability of scores. Changes in setting, timing, scheduling, presentation, or response that are considered to alter what the test is supposed to measure often are called ‘modifications,’ ‘nonstandard administrations,’ or ‘non-approved accommodations’" (Thurlow & Wiener, 2000).

Scores using non-approved accommodations are considered separately from scores from standard (approved) accommodated examinations, and are not included in aggregate measures used for accountability or proficiency determination. State and national policy makers and educational administrators face dilemmas in defining whether an accommodation meets the criteria for a standard accommodation, and also in how to appropriately select and use nonstandard accommodations. According to Thurlow and Wiener (2000), "Most states, however, are still in a climate of confusing terminology, policy, and practice, while awaiting clarification of their legal obligation to provide non-approved accommodations…. At the same time, however, test developers have not figured out how to report the results when these special types of accommodations are used, and states must decide how these will count in meeting high-stakes requirements. Thus, states are left on their own for now to answer questions about these special situations."

Other pages on this topic:

Other topics:

^ Top of Page ^

Publications  |  Topics  |  E-News  |  Events  | State Contacts

Web Sites  |  About NCSET  |  Home  |  Search

National Center on Secondary Education and Transition
Institute on Community Integration
University of Minnesota
6 Pattee Hall
150 Pillsbury Drive SE
Minneapolis MN 55455

© 2001-2017 Regents of the University of Minnesota
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Online Privacy Policy

This page was last updated on November 29, 2017.