NLTS2 Data Brief
Reports from the National Longitudinal Transition Study
September 2005 • Vol. 4, Issue 2
NLTS2 is being conducted by SRI International
Family Expectations and Involvement for Youth with Disabilities
By Lynn Newman
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has brought an increased awareness of the importance of family-school connections by focusing on the integral role parents play in assisting their children’s learning, encouraging parents to be actively involved in their children’s education, and including, for the first time in the history of federal education legislation, a specific statutory definition of parent involvement.
The evidence is persuasive and consistent that families play a critical role in nurturing their children’s educational growth (Fan & Chen, 2001; Henderson & Berla, 1994; Henderson & Mapp, 2002; Jeynes, 2003). Family support for learning is important for all students, but it may be particularly important for children with disabilities. One of the main tenets of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, last amended in 2004 (IDEA 2004) has been parents’ participation in decision-making related to their children’s education. However, despite legislative support for parental involvement, little information has been available until now to examine the actual level of family support for education that is given to middle- and high-school-age students with disabilities.
The National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) provides the first national picture of the involvement of families in the educational development of their secondary-school-age children with disabilities (see footnote 1). This Data Brief describes family involvement at home and at school, including a comparison of levels of involvement for families of youth with disabilities with those for families in the general population. It also discusses involvement in a school-based activity that is specific to families of youth with disabilities: participation in individualized education program (IEP) meetings. Finally, parent expectations for their children’s attainment of postsecondary education and independence are highlighted.
Involvement at Home
Families of most students with disabilities are very involved in supporting their children’s educational development at home. Most families report regularly talking with their children about school (82%) and helping with homework at least once a week (75%; Exhibit 1). One in five families provide homework assistance as often as five or more times per week.
Students with disabilities are more likely to receive help with homework than are their peers in the general population. The difference in homework support is especially apparent for those who receive frequent help: students with disabilities are five times as likely as their peers in the general population to receive homework assistance frequently (Exhibit 2). Only 4% of secondary school students in the general population receive help with homework five or more times a week, compared with 21% of youth with disabilities who receive homework assistance that often. At the other end of the homework-help spectrum—students who rarely receive help—students in the general population are almost twice as likely as those with disabilities to receive homework assistance never or rarely. Almost half (45%) of students in the general population receive homework help less than once a week; in contrast, only 24% of those with disabilities receive such infrequent assistance.
Family involvement in the education-related activities at home measured by NLTS2 varies across disability categories. Youth with emotional disturbances are among the least likely to receive help with homework. Families of youth with emotional disturbances are the least likely to help with homework frequently (18%) and the most likely to provide homework assistance less than once a week (36%). Students with multiple disabilities, autism, or orthopedic impairments receive the most frequent homework assistance, with 31% to 36% helped five or more times a week, compared with 20% of those with learning disabilities.
Involvement in School-Based Activities
Families of secondary-school-age students with disabilities participate in a wide range of school-based activities, including schoolwide meetings (e.g., back-to-school nights or PTA meetings), conferences with individual teachers, student or class activities (e.g., attending science fairs or musical performances), and volunteering at school (e.g., chaperoning class field trips or serving on school committees) (Exhibit 3).
Overall, 93% participate in at least one of these types of school-based activities. Approximately three out of four parents report attending school meetings (77%) and parent-teacher conferences (73%). Almost two-thirds (62%) report attending school or class events. Parents also report volunteering at school, although to a lesser extent than other types of school-based involvement, with about one-quarter volunteering.
Among parents of youth with disabilities who participate in school activities, the frequency of their involvement varies by type of activity. Parents who participate are most frequently at the school for school or class events, such as science fairs, student performances, sports activities, and awards assemblies. Of those who attend school or class events, 45% report attending five or more events during a school year.
Families of students with disabilities are as involved as their peers in the general population; and, for some types of school-based activities—general school meetings (77% vs. 70%) and parent-teacher conferences (73% vs. 56%)—they are more involved (Exhibit 3).
Family involvement in educational activities at school varies by disability category, with more variation in attending a school or class event or volunteering at school than in attending a general school meeting. Families of students with speech or orthopedic impairments are consistently among the most likely to participate in school meetings (82% and 78%) or in school or class events (68% and 68%), or to volunteer at the school (32% and 34%). Families of students with emotional disturbances or mental retardation are among the least likely to participate in three of the four types of school-based activities—school meetings (72% and 72%), events (50% and 57%), and volunteering (15% and 21%)—but they are among the most likely to attend parent-teacher conferences (73% and 74%).
Involvement in the Individualized Education Program (IEP) Process
Participation in the development of their children’s IEP is a type of family-school partnership specific to families of students with disabilities who qualify for special education services. Nearly 9 out of 10 parents of secondary-school-age students with disabilities (88%) report participating in at least one IEP meeting in the current or prior school year (Exhibit 4). Teachers’ perceptions of parents’ involvement in their children’s IEP meetings are consistent with parents’ reports of their own involvement. According to teachers, 83% of parents had attended the most recent IEP meeting in the current school year. Although this is slightly lower than the parent-reported attendance rate of 88%, some difference would be expected since teachers’ reports are for a 1-year period instead of the 2-year period reported by parents.
Family attendance at IEP meetings does not always ensure active participation in the decision-making process. Slightly more than half of the families report being involved in developing IEP goals. When asked how they feel about their family’s involvement in decisions about their children’s IEP, about one-third want to be more involved.
Families of students with other health impairments (96%) or traumatic brain injuries (96%) are among those most likely to attend IEP meetings. Families of students with mental retardation (85%) or speech impairments (86%) are among those least likely to attend IEP meetings.
NLTS2 findings suggest that family expectations for the future help shape the academic engagement and achievement of youth with disabilities, irrespective of the nature of the youth’s disabilities and their levels of functioning. If other factors are equal, youth with disabilities whose parents expect them to go on to postsecondary education after high school have more positive engagement and achievements while in high school than youth whose parents do not share that optimism for the future (Newman, 2005).
A majority of youth with disabilities, but not all, have parents who expect them to experience future success in many aspects of education and independence. When parents were asked how likely they thought it was that their adolescent children with disabilities would reach several independence milestones (see footnote 2), 85% or more expect their children “definitely” or “probably” will graduate from high school with a regular diploma and live independently (Exhibit 5). Although virtually all youth (97%) are expected to be able to find paid employment, parents are somewhat less certain that these jobs will pay enough for youth to achieve financial independence. Four out of five youth are expected to be able to support themselves financially, without family or government support.
Parents of youth with disabilities also are optimistic about their children’s graduation from high school with a regular diploma; 85% expect youth will “definitely” or “probably” achieve this milestone (Exhibit 6). Parents are far less confident that youth will attend and graduate from postsecondary school. About three of five youth are expected to further their education after high school. Fewer than half are expected to complete a postsecondary vocational, technical, or trade school (46%), or a 2-year college (47%). Expectations regarding graduation from a 4-year college are lower, with approximately one-third expected to complete this type of institution.
Youth with disabilities are much less likely to be expected to continue their education after high school than are their peers in the general population (62% vs. 92%) (see footnote 3). Parents of youth with disabilities also are markedly less positive than other parents about youth’s graduating from a 4-year college; 36% of those with disabilities are expected “definitely” or “probably” to complete a 4-year college program, whereas 88% of their peers in the general population are expected to receive a 4-year college diploma.
As with most aspects of youth’s experiences, these expectations are not shared equally by all youth with disabilities. Expectations for postsecondary education enrollment is relatively high for youth with speech/language or hearing or visual impairments. On all dimensions of independence, youth with learning disabilities or speech impairments are the most likely to be expected “definitely” to attain independence milestones. Lower educational and independence expectations are particularly common for youth with mental retardation, autism, multiple disabilities, and deaf-blindness.
NLTS2 provides a national picture of families’ involvement at home and at school in support of their children’s education during the secondary school years, and families’ expectations for their children’s future achievements. Families of secondary-school-age students with disabilities are actively involved both at home and at school. Compared with their peers in the general population, families of students with disabilities are more involved in assisting with homework, and they are as involved, and at times more involved, in school-based activities. In addition, many families of youth with disabilities hold high expectations for their children’s future success in several aspects of education and independence, which have been shown to relate to higher engagement and achievement among students with disabilities while in high school. Longitudinal analyses in subsequent waves of NLTS2 will shed light on how parent roles unfold over a period of years and how family involvement and expectations affect later outcomes as youth with disabilities transition from school to early adult life.
The author is part of the NLTS2 research team at the Center for Education and Human Services, SRI International.
Fan, X. T., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.
Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (1994). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Jeynes, W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 202-218.
Newman, L. (2005). Family involvement in the educational development of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
NLTS2 Welcomes Feedback!
333 Ravenswood Ave.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
- NLTS2 has a nationally representative sample of more than 11,000 youth who on December 1, 2000, were ages 13 through 16, receiving special education, and in at least seventh grade. Information from NLTS2 is weighted to represent youth with disabilities nationally as a group, as well as youth in each of the 12 federal special education disability categories used in NLTS2. The information reported here was gathered from parents/guardians of NLTS2 youth in telephone interviews or through mail questionnaires in the spring and summer of 2001.
- Possible responses were "definitely will," "probably will," "probably won't," and "definitely won't."
- Figures for the general population were calculated from the 1999 National Household Education Survey. Data are for 13- to 17-year-olds.
^ Top of Page ^
There are no copyright restrictions on this document. However, please cite and credit the source when copying all or part of this material.
This report was supported in whole or in part by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, (Cooperative Agreement No. H326J000005). The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, and no official endorsement by the Department should be inferred.
This publication is available in an alternate format upon request. To request an alternate format or additional copies, contact NCSET at 612.624.2097.